Simple Solutions That Work! Issue 11

#18). They felt this should give them a good indication of die life. The first die (Cav #17) was put into production in February of 2016. The initial results showed heat check starting to occur around 5,000 shots which was similar to the H-13 dies. However, DH31-EX has a much finer matrix than H-13. Once the heat check starts to occur the material stabilizes and the heat check pretty much stays at the same level and does not get worse. For the past year and a half they have had one minor weld in one area – no other rework has been needed and no plugging of the holes whatsoever. Since October of 2017 the original 3 dies have produced the following parts: Cav #16 67,522 shots Cav #17 81,285 shots Cav #18 39,015 shots This has saved the customer a tremendous amount of down time as well as money. All future dies are now produced with DH31-EX. CASE STUDY #2 Automotive Housing Cover Challenge: We were approached by a large die casting group to review a couple of issues they were having in the market place. The first issue was to look at different steel grades that will enhance their competitiveness and tool life. The second was to look at LCC tooling that will provide more competitive tool costs as part of a larger quote package. A review of their lost business opportunities showed that tooling costs were one of the highest factors in not obtaining new business. One of their first trials to combat these issues was an automotive housing cover. The original cover was getting 10,000-15,000 shots before it had to be reworked. This rework increased their overall tooling costs while decreasing their die life. Solution: The customer was interested in trying a new die steel to see how it affected die life with regards to this part. The die steel selected for this application was DH31-EX (46-48 HRC). The DH31-EX die is currently at 50,000-60,000 shots with no rework required to date. This customer saw a similar situation as did the customer in Case Study #1. The heat check began to show slightly early on in the die life. This was similar to the other H-13 materials trialed in production. However, it seemed to stop with no further degradation occurring. This saved the customer serious money with regards to eliminating rework as well as the need to build more dies for this application. CASE STUDY #3 Low pressure die casting Challenge: This application involved a low pressure wheel die casting. This customer was having severe cracking issues with their H-13 dies. The cracking was almost always located in the same area in Contact: PAUL BRITTON britt@imsteel.com the die. The area in question was a thin walled section that built up a significant amount of heat. The H-13 dies would yield between 8,000-11,000 shots before the dies were pulled from production. The original H-13 dies were hardened to 41-43 HRC. Solution: The customer decided to try DH31- EX for this application. The die was heat treated to approximately 38.5 HRC. The die was also welded in the thin wall area. We are not sure what type of weld rod was used. Even though the hardness was below the specified hardness range of 41-43 HRC, and the part had been welded in one area. The DH31-EX was able to almost double the tool life compared to H-13. The total shot count was 20,657 shots before it was pulled out of service. The customer recognized the abnormalities between the two dies and will give DH31-EX another try when this part comes back for production. The customer stills views this trial as a success compared to the original H-13 die. It’s very common to use what you have been using – because it’s a safe bet. The NADCA die steel selection chart details many other options that are tested and proven in the field to be cost reducing because they are higher performing and last longer. The next time you are considering using what you always have been using, venture out to do a simple test. You may be pleasantly surprised, much like the three customers above. 67 MAKING YOUR INSTALLATION ASUCCESS